viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2013

World-wide Writing

World-wide Writing
In “Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to academic writing”, Christine M. Tardy (2010) gives an account on how students can start developing academic writing skills through the use of a project based on Wikipedia-writing.
            The article is divided into different sections. In the introduction, the author points out the need to instruct students in classrooms to write formal academic texts. After this, she gives a brief definition of Wikipedia and its usefulness as a site of reference. She also makes reference to the importance of evaluating chosen sources to give credibility to students’ writing. For this, learners must resort to footnotes and references, which implies them “to engage in correct citation practices” (Tardy, 2010, para. 10).
            The project presents eight steps to be followed when writing academically for Wikipedia. In the first step, the author advises writers to get acquainted with the website conventions and guidelines. Once learners have become familiar with Wikipedia, they must select a topic and start looking sources up. The next stage requires outlining and paraphrasing.  When creating outlines, students “should paraphrase any text that they have kept from the original source” (Tardy, 2010, para. 24). Drafting is the following stage. In it, students must have the necessary information and a plan to organize it. In addition, they should continue including parenthetical references to the employed sources using, for instance, lettered tags. Next, revising is a must, and it can be done by a peer, for example. In step 6, students must be ready to cite sources considering conventions, and then they have to polish what it will be their final version. The last stage involves publishing the writing on Wikipedia for its global audience.
            In conclusion, in her article, Tardy develops a Wikipedia-based project that students can employ following several steps. Through it, learners will be able to develop not only academic writing skills but also skills of academic research.

Reference
Tardy, C.M.(2010).Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to Academic Writing. English Teaching Forum,1, pp.12-19,27.


The Use of In-text Citations and Signal Phrases

The Use of In-text citations, Signal Phrases 
In the following analytical paper, three different issues will be analyzed in depth: the use of in-text citations, and signal phrases. Each of these issues will be exemplified through instances extracted from the article “Providing increased access to English L2 students of computer science at a South African University.US-China Education Review” by Dalvit,L., Murray, S. and Terzoli, A. (2005).
According to the American Psychological Association (2010), in-text citations are a combination of the author’s surname, the date of publication as well as the location reference, separated by commas. In-text citations can be classified into paraphrased ones and direct quotes; there are some variations, though. As regards the paraphrased ones, they are characterized by the inclusion of dates, and they can be added in a text in two different ways. Firstly, the author’s name can be included in a signal phrase and the date needs to be written between parentheses. An example of this in the text under analysis is, “(…) According to Heugh (2002), little has changed since the end of Apartheid.(…)” (Dalvit, L., Murray, S. & Terzoli, A., 2005). Secondly, if the writer makes reference to a study, he/she must list in the parentheses not only the author’s surname but also the year. An instance of the text being analyzed is, “(…) As far as language problems are concerned, the current approach to foundation programmes in South Africa is mainly informed by studies in the Humanities (Boughey, 2002) and seems to address the particular problems of students in that field (e.g. internalizing the values of the academic world, adopting a style of writing which is considerably different to common language, mastering specific syntactic structures etc.).(…)”(Dalvit et al.). Considering direct quotes, they need the author’s surname, date of publication and the abbreviation p. or pp. with the page number(s), but no examples of them were found in the analyzed document.
            It is worth mentioning at this stage some of the variations of these in-text citations, which occur when there are several writers, institutions or groups as authors. When a research article has several authors, their names are listed completely the first time the source is mentioned. In later references of the same source, the first author’s surname is followed by et al., everything between parentheses. In this paper, the first example taken from the text under analysis is followed by all the authors’ last names (see lines 13-14), but the second time citations were included for the sake of exemplification, there appears the surname of the first author accompanied by the abbreviation et al. (see line 20). One last variation is that in which the author is an institution or group. The first time they are cited, the full name followed by its abbreviation and year of publication must be included in parentheses. In subsequent mentions of this source, only abbreviation can be employed. The following is an instance of the text being analyzed, “(…)Providing access to ICT to the African1 component of the south African population is a priority for the Government, and education has a key role to play (Department of Education and Department of Communication, 2001). (…)”(Dalvit et al).
            Signal phrases can also be used to introduce quotations or citations in texts. In the one by Dalvit et al., the following signal phrase appears, “(…) According to Heugh (2002), little has changed since the end of Apartheid. The average level of English proficiency within the African community is still comparatively low. (…)”(Dalvit et al.).
            With respect to reference lists, they are added at the end of a document, and they account for in-text citations which have appeared in that document. Observing the reference list of the document being analyzed, it shows basic principles to be considered when making it. If a book is to be included in this list, the author, publication date, title and subtitle, place of publication and publisher must appear. An example taken from the reference list of the document under analysis is, “Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press” (Dalvit et al.).





References
Dalvit,L., Murray, S. and Terzoli, A. (2005). Providing increased access to English L2 students of computer science at a South African University.  US-China Education Review, Sep.2005, Vol 2 (9)



Discourse Community

Discourse Community: its Six Basic Criteria
            There are different definitions of a discourse community. Most of them coincide with the fact that it is formed by a number of expert as well as apprentice members who create and use a system of speech and writing specific to that particular community, and who have to give not only information but also feedback. Swales proposes six basic criteria that a discourse community should meet in order to be recognized as such.
One of the basic requirements proposed by Swales is that a discourse community must share goals. In her UCLA community college review, Kelly-Kleese (2004) considers college professionals to be a discourse community since they share goals such as asserting their knowledge and power in higher education, all this through discourse with a particular structure and style. Another criterion is the use of participatory mechanisms since its members must give not only information but also feedback. That is, they have to be able to communicate and negotiate meanings, and be critical of the realities represented by others (Kelly-Kleese, 2004). Furthermore, it is necessary for discourse community members to be communicated among them. “Interactions with people in one’s environment are major determinants of what is learned and how learning takes place.(…)”(Wenzlaff, T., Weseman, K.C., 2004. Teachers need Teachers to grow, p.1). In other words, the way members think and express their thoughts can be the result of their interaction over time.
            One more requirement proposed by Swales (1990) is that discourse communities must share specific genres when communicating. According to Kelly-Kleese (2004), discourse community members have developed a common discourse which possesses a particular style and structure. She exemplifies this idea in her review above mentioned, with the discourse employed by administrators - a separate discourse community within the college community in higher education – to communicate and achieve purposes. This involves the use of specialized terminology, which is the fifth requirement proposed by Swales (1990) as regards the establishment of discourse communities. Finally, the discourse group should have a high level of expertise. A writer within a discourse community can have more prestige, more possibilities of exerting power through  his/her discourse if he/she has and demonstrates a high level of knowledge in what he/she is writing about (Kelly-Kleese, 2004).




References
Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A. J., & Lopez Torres, L. (2003). Beyond reflection: teacher learning as praxis. Theory into Practice. Retrieved October 2007, fromhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_3_42/ai_108442653
Kelly-Kleese, C. (2001). Editor’s Choice: An Open Memo to Community College Faculty and Administrators. Community College Review. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_29/ai_77481463
Wenzlaff, T. L., & Wieseman, K. C. (2004). Teachers Need Teachers To Grow. Teacher Education Quarterly. Retrieved October 2007, fromhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3960/is_200404/ai_n9349405
Kelly-Kleese, C. (2004). UCLA community college review: community college scholarship and discourse. Community College Review. Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_32/ai_n6361541